I’m very curious and a little trepidatious about the type of humor Gearbox will be implementing with FL4K. It’s characterized as an “emergent AI”. From the little they’ve released so far about FL4K, the pronoun of choice has always been “they”, not “him” or “her”. I’m wondering if Gearbox is trying to implement the story of someone searching for their identity, not knowing where they fit in in society. This could be applied to LGBTQ people in the progressive world. I’m somewhat apprehensive about how the broader playerbase might react to this if it winds up being the case.
There were quite a few players who reacted quite negatively to Tiny Tina. This could be even worse.
NOTE: Please don’t make this into a hyper political argument. Please be civil. Regardless of your stance, I’m just curious if you think this is the direction Gearbox is taking considering so many games and movies these days are trying to insert themselves into the political sphere.
I don’t mind whichever pronounce Fl4k will have, but I prefer for things not to go further than that. LGBT characters rarely are written well, and even in the case of Dragon Age’s Krem it took several rewrites before he was done well.
I’m so freaking stoked we have a non-binary main character playable in a game. Having gendered robots in the previous installments states this is a distinct choice.
I do not believe there will be a search for identity in the way I assume you meant.
ABur did say Maya was Ace (asexual), so, this is exactly what I hoped and expected.
I don’t necessarily think it has to do with them being written “well”, I think it’s that everyone is kind of on edge about them being in there in the first place. Certain people have issues with LGBT ideas in games, some people desperately want those characters, and others are just really skiddish about how those characters will be received by the more extreme or passionate crowds. Many people become harsh critics now matter if the writing was done well or not. It’s a very interesting thing to watch.
No, often their only character trait is being trans/bi/etc. Janey Springs is a good example of this, where all she does is reminding the player that she is a lesbian.
Again, I don’t mind LGBT characters in gaming, one of my all time favorite characters even falls under the umbrella. And with her things are (heavily) implied, not thrown in your face.
In case you’re not familiar, the word is skittish :)!
But like, the choice to NOT include Queer characters and people IS a political decision. It’s the decision to omit people who exist from a fantasy universe that has far more ludicrous things than LGBT people. Not putting in gay people is a decision to say you don’t think gay people should exist.
And that’s what people miss. They think that keeping something out isn’t making it political, but putting it in is. Which isn’t how it works.
Janey was hitting on Athena. That’s how many lesbians flirt. “Oh, I’m not into men” until you go “oh, you mean you might be into me”. A solid look at twitter can tell ya that
I have to heavily disagree with you on your point about not including them being a political decision.
For your reference, here is an article from 2017 citing that the percentage of Americans who identify as LGBT is 4%. That is an extremely small number. https://www.thedailybeast.com/just-how-many-lgbt-americans-are-there
If there are 20 characters in a game, that would mean there is a very small chance that < 1 of those individuals is LGBT. There is a much higher chance that one of the games’ characters would be a religious extremist rather than LGBT (which actually quite a few games, including BL3 have religious extremists). But do all games have extremists of the religious variety? No. Why? Because they represent a small portion of the population. If every developer always puts an LGBT person into their game that would be completely unrealistic.